Do I believe in God?

Hello, Mr. Einstein!

Although not all the theories of Mr. Einstein take place in my brain, one of his statements did make a confusion easier for my neurons to evaluate. He said, "The more I study science, the more I believe in God." Einstein...

I can write it in a non-poetic way. I'm good at this, I guess. He explained his beliefs in a way that relates science to our creator, not religion. The more he tried to understand what science says about our world and surroundings, the more he believes in God, the deeper his faith in the Creator becomes. If we try to understand this sentence, maybe we will be able to grasp its Mahatma. 

How we can define the invention of our Scientific Theories?

We all know more or less about different scientific terms. Now the question is how these terms were born? How these formulas were proved. Of course, in every explanation, scientists took one or the other object or subject as ideal. But again the question is why that subject or object was taken as the norm. He could have taken anything else. But, I think, the reason for taking that object as an ideal is the point of view of the scientist who completed the research. Actually, it can be said as the perspective of other scientific theories, theories based on many revolutions and scientists' views. One hypothesis led to creating another mega hypothesis. And based on many small relative perspectives, one scientific term was born. Someone would say that I'm talking garbage. But, hey, don't think like that. It's just a thought of my parallel mind. What I believe. We have our own beliefs to believe. Don't we?

I believe everything is relative. What if after centuries we found out that there are multiple universes that create the relativity of our life? Until then, we were just believing what we were seeing, what we can believe. But, after that, everything changed, every equation changed their math. Homo sapiens did believe one time that Sun revolves around the earth and many generations believed that theory blindly, worshiped, and created their God accordingly. Didn't they? So isn't there a slight chance that the alternate dimension theory might get correct??

Everything is Relative??

What I am trying to say is that everything in this universe is relative. Relativity lies in the equations of math, abstracts of scientific papers, or what else. Scientists do write a paper based on other theories or even if they don't take others as their ideal, the words they are writing on the paper, are just a creation of their creative mind. They think of their hypothesis in some way, researched their way through problems, find some solutions according to the environmental subjects and etc., etc. But what is the real problem here? I am not saying there is a problem. I'm just saying how we think about one subject might get wrong at some point. We always write about one thing from one perspective. That could be an addition of different points of view, but at the end of the day, it's just a merge of your thoughts getting ideas from others. Would every object we consider really be ideal for our thoughts? How? 

I personally think nothing is ideal in this world. Question yourself one thing: How much we know of this universe?

Consider a book. A book contains every single piece of information Homo sapiens have gathered about the mystery of this world. A book where you can find anything that has been identified previously by humans. If we consider all the information this universe holds as a pile of books, the book we considered early, would be just one of them. One of them among millions, or maybe billions. There are an infinite amount of data that are still needed to be explored. It can't stop, the number mustn't be finite. Otherwise, humans will be purposeless. And, purposeless brings catastrophe. Just like the quote: "Idle mind is devil's workshop".

Ok. Let's introduce some math!

If I were to say in numbers, I would say that the book doesn't even contain 0.000...1% information of this universe and we, as an individual, don't even have the knowledge of just a single page of this book. Just think about how big this book is and how little we know about this world. And, here we are, fighting about cultures, religions, races, and whatnot. Just take a moment from your life and think about how insignificant our knowledge is. How limited our neurons are to store this information.

Now let's look at an example that might explain some of today's discussions. Since I started the discussion with Einstein's words, I would love to drag one of his equations. E = mc2. Where E is the amount of energy converted, m is the mass and c is the speed of the light. Now to find out our desired value i.e. the value of E here, we need variables. The speed of light and the amount of mass are the two fundamental variables. Now we know the speed of light is 299 792 458 m/s. After many experiments, it has been possible to find out this value. But, what if this value is a subject of illusion according to a different universe. There the velocity of light acts negatively or in an inverse way. What if after 200 years scientists found out that the way Ole Roemer measured the v of light was relative to a certain environment. It totally acts differently on the other side of the galaxy. That's why the signal we send to aliens never reaches there. Vice-versa can happen also. So, what was/is wrong? In context structure? In scientific research? 

What is wrong then?

No, we don't really know that contextual structures are wrong. No one is wrong. Everything is just relative to one another. But the moment we disbelief in god, I personally think, we assume something very wrong. How much we know? How can we establish an idea with this little knowledge? 

 A question kept popping into my head as a child. That is, we know that the sun is the "America" of our solar system. As a child, I learned that the sun contains 55 percent of hydrogen, 44 percent helium, and 1 percent of other gases, from which energy is generated through fusion, and our entire solar system is powered by them. Then we understand the power source of this solar system. But my question was where did this helium and hydrogen come from?? Well, Bing Bang comes in that point. 

The purpose of Human Life.

Everything has slowly changed from Bing Bang. And somehow, these gases hit together and gave birth to our Sun. But why did Bing Bang happen? We know that energy must be provided to perform any task. So where the power of happening Big Bang did came from? Well, I guess that energy was generated through some sort of reaction. However, now the question is why the reaction happened? Why this, why? Is there an end to this question? Much like a chain reaction, it is moving forward. How is the matter with us now? Everything must be stuck in one place for an ideal answer? Now, if someone says that this has happened out of nowhere, that answer is certainly not acceptable, and if it has to be accepted, then all the scientific rules of this present world will be fragile. Because we have so far proved that in order to work, we must provide energy. Question something, answer the question, again question about the answer. These three scenarios come after one another. We, humans, work to harmonize these three phrases. It's a chain reaction. It is the purpose of human life. To find answers.

What my parallel mind think of these mysteries?

This article may be an example of how everything is relative. Nothing in our lives is absolute. I don't know how many thousands of years it took us to discover 0.001% of the information in this universe. And that is when my faith in God comes. We know so little to judge ourselves. We know so little to be an atheist. But, we know that there is one thing that created the ignition of this world. That's why I believe in God. Just to accept the idea that someone created this universe/multiverse. Someone created this beautiful world. And, as human beings, it is our purpose to find the answers and believe in god. The more you go in-depth, the more questions will appear, and the more you will wonder about god. That's what I believe. Because of that belief, even if this relative world is a little bit absolute. An English philosopher named Francis Bacon once said that a little scientific knowledge can make a person disbelieve in the Creator but a deep knowledge of science can make a person believe in the Creator.

And I do believe in my GOD.